As a general rule, a court proceeding should be your last result. However, in some cases, the court can offer an effective way to resolve contact disputes. The Code of Civil Procedure (CPR) provides detailed guidelines for the process. At the same time, the court expects the parties to review the minutes before demining a claim. Failure to take these provisions into account will result in sanctions at a later date in the proceedings. The minutes of the preliminary action define the steps the parties must take to contain the case before proceedings are opened and to resolve the dispute without having to file a complaint. As a result, there is still sufficient time to comply with the corresponding protocol before the statute of limitations expires. Under these conditions, an application form should be notified and the other party should be informed of the intention to apply for a «suspension of proceedings» until the pre-trial process is closed. This approach will avoid subsequent requests for cost or sanctions sanctions. Executive participation.
People generally see dispute resolution as a lawyer problem so that lawyers work behind closed doors with little supervision. Of course, traditional litigation offers few opportunities for close involvement of individual managers. But in all forms of ADR, early and personal involvement in conflict resolution or conflicting business leaders is often essential for an effective and timely solution. The REL mechanisms require, by their very nature, greater participation of cross-party parties and a more positive response. An executive`s investment in time and effort will generate excellent long-term returns. If a dispute arises as a result of or related to this treaty, and the parties do not resolve the dispute through negotiations, any party to the dispute may immediately submit a conciliation notification to the other party. This communication must be made in writing and indicate the contentious issues. As we will see, some REL mechanisms work better than others.