Once the IP is properly classified separately or in common, two other critical questions must be answered: «Who can use the IP» Who controls the IP These concepts are more different than they can appear. The right to use the investigation period is precisely the right to use either the intellectual protection rights of the other parties, the period of investigation developed jointly, or the period of investigation developed separately. On the other hand, the right of control is the right to determine which others, apart from the parties, can use the property developed in common and under what conditions. JDA`s core planning strategy takes into account three categories of IP rights to be considered: «The intellectual property of each party before the JDA» IP, which was developed jointly during the JDA, IP developed by the parties during the JDA, the GST rate which is considered a registered person for the transfer of development rights, the ISP and the lease of long-term land, in the case of the main tax on the provision of these services, the application of the consideration in point (a) in the form of work and development rights in accordance with clause b) for the payment of a central tax on the provision of these services , for the consideration received in the form of work covered in point (a) and in the form of development rights covered by point (b), contractor, construction company or any other registered person; , as may be the case, transfers the property or right in the built complex, building or civil structure, to the person who enters into the development rights by concluding a transportation document or similar instrument (e.g.B. letter of award) JDA is a common factor in the real estate sector that binds the landowner and the developer in an agreement for the construction of new buildings/projects. In return, by the developer agrees to provide as i. Vision of the sum of wolf, ii. The percentage of revenue or a certain percentage of the newly constructed project on the land in question depends on the conditions set by the parties. The value collected by the lessor on the delivery of TDR or open market value (perceived by the government during the collection of stamp duty) if such a TDR agreement has been entered into is charged.
Now you have to wonder why it is imp to save JDA. At the macro level, neither the owners nor the landowners can dispute the terms and conditions of the registered JDA. Second, it gives authenticity to the agreement. In one case, I found that there were 23 corrections in the joint development agreement. It was almost impossible for the buyer to know whether the corrections were true or not. When the joint development contract is registered, the buyer can directly request a certified copy compliant with the shelter. The definition of intellectual property developed in common must be considered with the utmost care and is one of the most common areas for future differences of opinion. More often than not, a party will feel that it developed a technology during the JDA period, but that it was developed separately from the JDA and that it should be «separate» and not «shared.» The common intellectual protection procedure raises very serious control problems, particularly with regard to the patented intellectual protection procedure. U.S. law allows any co-owner of a patent to sell, use, sell or offer the patented invention to other owners without consent or accounting.